Class action takes aim at Victorian Government for lost jobs


The Victorian Government is facing legal action from workers who lost their jobs during the second round of coronavirus restrictions in the state.Key points:The civil suit argues the State Government is liable for damages because of its handling of the hotel quarantine systemLawyer Tony Carbone said the plaintiffs were not blaming the Government for any job losses before the second lockdownA separate legal action was filed in Supreme Court on Monday, against Victoria’s Deputy Public Health Commander, for the city’s curfew to be declared “unlawful and invalid”Lawyer Tony Carbone, who is representing plaintiffs including a 21-year-old worker made redundant from his roadside assistance job, said they were suing for people’s loss of income during stage 3 and 4 restrictions.”But for the State Government’s inept handling of the hotel quarantine, we wouldn’t have had the second round of lockdowns and people wouldn’t have lost their jobs,” he said.”What I want to make clear is this — we’re not blaming the Government for any job losses prior to the second round of lockdowns.”We’re saying that this claim picks up anyone that has lost their job because of the second round of lockdowns.”The civil suit argues that the State Government is liable for damages because of its handling of the hotel quarantine system.For the latest news on the coronavirus pandemic read our live blog.Mr Carbone said there was no need to wait until the independent inquiry into the hotel quarantine system had concluded.”There’s enough information out there to show that this second round of lockdowns is due to the incompetent handling — and really, the negligence — of the Government appointing the security companies to look after returned travellers,” he said.”It’s all out there.”Read more about coronavirus:Mr Carbone said the second lockdown had devastated many employers, some of whom would not reopen.”Most employers that I spoke to prior to the second round of lockdowns were very optimistic about getting back to 60 per cent, 70 per cent or 80 per cent of capacity by the end of the year,” he said.”I’ve spoken to a lot of these people in recent times and they’ve been very, very disheartened.”Victoria’s road to recoveryA spokesperson for the Victorian Government said: “As this matter is before the courts, it’d be inappropriate to comment any further.”A separate legal action has been launched by a cafe owner who claims her business in Capel Sound, on the Mornington Peninsula, has been put under “significant pressure” due to Melbourne’s stage 4 restrictions.Michelle Loielo, 41, who has flagged her intention to run for Liberal Party preselection at the next state election, said her business’s turnover had dropped from $20,000 a week to $400.On Monday, lawyers for Ms Loielo filed a motion in the Supreme Court against Michelle Giles, who is Victoria’s Deputy Public Health Commander, for the city’s curfew to be declared “unlawful and invalid”.They claim that the curfew is not “reasonably proportionate” and that public health officials behind the lockdown failed to take into account the “social and psychological impact” of the measure and their client’s human rights.What you need to know about coronavirus:

Source link

Share:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *